184H

Did you know that fighting or arguing is actually good for your marriage?  A complete absence of arguing is definitely not good. It could be a sign of emotional detachment. Thank goodness! Because Todd and I have had our fair share of arguments in our 12 years of marriage. I have read all the advice on not going to bed angry. Blah, blah, blah…I go to bed too early for that nonsense. We can talk about it tomorrow. Half the reason we have an argument is because one of us is tired or in a bad mood. Why  should I lose sleep to keep arguing in circles? That’s just me if you hold tight to that philosophy that’s great. You can probably skip this blog…But for those of us that don’t yet have our grandparents happily ever after love affair where we die 1 hour apart at the age of  89…listen up.

I rarely have any kind of arguments in general but when I do it’s usually a close member of my family and usually it’s my husband. Although, my best girlfriend and mother will get my wrath every once in a while. That’s because I know I can unload my frustrations or take out my hard day on them..because they love me when I am good and when I am bad. Which is exactly why we pick fights with the people who love us the most.

Here is why you should examine how you argue.Professional Boxers have very clear cut rules.

Rule # 1 Do not hit below the belt.

These are below the belt moves. They shut down the fight. Stop playing dirty and win the fight not to mention saving your marriage. 

Imagine starting off a discussion with your spouse about an issue that upsets you. If you are feeling frustrated and resentful your first uttered words might be harsh, sarcastic or critical. For example, “The trouble with you is …,” or “Why do you always have to be so selfish?” or “My problem with you is that you never ….” Notice the accusing and hostile tone of these words. Imagine the body language associated with the tone. This is what is called a harsh startup, meaning how you “started” discussing the issue was severe, sharp or accusing.

According to Gottman who is the guru of everything marriage, ninety-six percent of the time a harsh startup predicts how the argument will end—negatively and without resolution. Once an argument starts off in a negative direction, it very rarely “rights” itself. Harsh start-ups are strongly associated with divorce and relationship break-up.

The Four Horseman of the Apocalypse

These are four hostile forms of communication that put couples at high risk for divorce when these patterns take up permanent residence in the relationship.Criticism is defined as blaming, faultfinding, or using global and negative labels to attack your partner’s character. For example, “How would you know? You’re never home,” or “My problem with you is ….” A harsh startup often comes in the form of criticism.

Contempt is a lack of respect for your partner’s dignity, an attitude of looking down on your partner as unworthy. Forms of contempt include name-calling, put-downs, sarcasm, cynicism, swearing at each other, rolling of the eyes, mockery or hostile humor. Contempt is demeaning and conveys not just disapproval of your partner’s behavior, but disgust with who your partner is. While the other three horsemen show up in small amounts in most marriages, contempt is only found in toxic relationships. This horseman also includes belligerence, which is an aggressive and angry provocation or threat.

Defensiveness is a way of turning back a perceived attack. Someone who is defensive denies their partner’s statements, refuses to admit their role in problems, avoids responsibility for how they impact their partner, or deflects their partner’s complaints back onto the other person. Defensiveness is destructive because it escalates tension and creates an adversarial interaction.

Stonewalling usually occurs as a result of escalating criticism, contempt and defensiveness as emotional overload becomes intense. Spouses who stonewall stubbornly refuse to give any verbal or nonverbal feedback that they are listening or attending to what their partner is saying. Often they just get up and leave the room. It’s like talking to a stone wall. Stonewalling is best seen as a containment strategy that spouses use to avoid further escalation of the conflict. The problem is that the stonewaller does not just avoid the fight, but avoids his spouse and the relationship as well. According to John Gottman’s research, 85% of stonewallers are men.

Flooding

Normally, when you encounter a stressful and threatening situation, your body reacts in a way that helps you to deal with the danger. Your body temporarily shuts down non-essential systems, channels blood flow to your large muscles, creates extra fuel for energy, heightens your sensitivity to signs of danger and releases hormones that help you deal with stress.

Normally, this “fight-or-flight” response works well when we have to fight off an attacker, escape from a burning house, or perform a miraculous feat of strength. The problem is that it also impairs our ability to process information and to think clearly before we speak—exactly the abilities we need to have in order to work through difficult areas of disagreement with our spouse.

John Gottman has a vivid word for this physiological “fight-or-flight” reaction. He calls it “flooding.” Flooding occurs when you and your spouse get into hostile arguments where the Four Horseman (criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling) are allowed free reign in your relationship.

Physical signs of flooding include rapid heart rate (above 100BPM), high blood pressure, sweating, and the overwhelming urge to leave or to say something hurtful. When we become flooded, we operate mainly from a self-preservation mindset. We seek mainly to protect ourselves from the turmoil of an escalating argument, either by becoming aggressive (verbally or physically) or by trying to get away.

In distressed marriages, we commonly find habitual harsh startups by the wife combined with frequent flooding and subsequent stonewalling by the husband. This common pattern leads to a vicious communication cycle where one partner repeatedly complains, nags, criticizes and blames her spouse, while the other person repeatedly avoids, withdraws, stonewalls, or dismisses his partner. The withdrawn spouse might initially respond by counterattacking or by being defensive but eventually he switches to withdrawal in order to avoid being overwhelmed.

It becomes a cycle because the more the husband withdraws and avoids his wife, the more frustrated and resentful she becomes. Eventually the resentment comes out as criticism and blame, which leaves her husband feeling unappreciated and overwhelmed, and so he avoids her more, so her resentment continues to build, and on it goes. Sometimes the pattern is reversed and it is the wife who withdraws and the husband who pursues.

This vicious cycle is maintained by each spouse’s reaction to the other person, and by their respective fear-based focus on self-preservation. It is important to note that their reactions, on a core level, are really attempted solutions to difficult situations; but each person’s “solution” fuels the flames instead of extinguishing them.

Failed Repair Attempts

Repair attempts are efforts to de-escalate conflict and avoid flooding. Repair attempts are words, phrases, or responses intended to soften the conflict, to get things back on track, to start over, or to acknowledge or recognize the other person’s view. For example, “I’m sorry,” or “I see your point,” or “Please don’t raise your voice with me,” or “Maybe we can compromise,” or “That’s not what I meant.”

According to Gottman’s research, couples in distressed marriages actually make more repair attempts than do happy couples. The problem is that these repair attempts repeatedly fail.

Distressed couples are often so ruled by negative intentions and the desire to protect themselves or to hurt the other person, that they either ignore or do not recognize each other’s repair attempts. In happy marriages, spouses make fewer repair attempts, but that is because the ones they do make are received. They work.

When couples stop responding to each other’s attempts to de-escalate the conflict, when they use the Four Horseman on a habitual basis, when they become frequently flooded, until one or both partners withdraw without resolution of the conflict, then the marriage will become a source of pain and torment rather than comfort and support. Where repair attempts are repeatedly failing, and the Four Horseman are habitually present, Gottman found that over 90% of couples will eventually divorce.

What determines whether repair attempts will succeed or fail? The strength of the marital friendship and how positively each partner feels about the other. This is why it is so important to focus on building friendship, positive sentiment and goodwill toward each other. Friendship, goodwill and fondness become the foundation for effectively using communication and conflict resolution skills.

RESOLVING YOUR CONFLICTS

If you have been married for some time and you recognize some of these signs in your own relationship, don’t be discouraged. As long as you are willing to make conscious efforts and you are committed to your relationship these negative patterns can be reversed.

If you are fairly new as a couple, start now to build mutual respect and goodwill into your relationship and learn how to protect your relationship from these corrosive behaviors ever taking hold in the first place.

Time and space don’t permit a full discussion about how to turn things around, but let me offer a brief summary of principles that can stop or help prevent these negative communication behaviors from consuming your relationship. Some of these principles are inspired by Gottman’s work mixed in with my own clinical experience.

    • When you raise an issue, approach your spouse softly, respectfully. Let your choice of words be guided by an attitude of friendship and respect. Remember that this is your life partner. Think about the things you love and respect about this person. If you habitually treated a friend of yours in a mean-spirited or aggressive way how long would that person stay your friend?

 

    • Let your partner influence you. Learn to open space for your spouse’s ideas, feelings and perspectives to arise as real and valid. Try to be responsive to your partner’s requests. Adopt the policy of never saying “no”, outright, to your partner’s needs. If you can’t accomodate a request, then negotiate alternatives or other options.

 

    • Act with positive intentions to create understanding, to show respect, and to find win-win solutions, instead of acting on your immediate, negative intentions and fears. Use your positive intentions to make and receive repair attempts.

 

    • Learn how to self-soothe and soothe your partner through appropriate time-outs and self-reflection. Sometimes this is a necessary step in order to re-align your intentions with positive goals and to calm down enough to think about what the real issues are for you.

 

    • Pinpoint the real issues that fuel the conflict. These are underlying needs, dreams and goals and sometimes the fears related to your needs, dreams and goals. Don’t get sidetracked by arguing about details such as what your spouse said three months ago. If you are not sure what your spouse’s underlying issue is, ask. Be curious. Not recognizing these underlying issues will often keep couples stuck in gridlock.

 

    • Learn the art of compromise. Adopt a mindset that each of you have dreams and interests that need to be honored. You can find creative win-win solutions if you stop allowing your fear to be your dominant motivator. I know what some people might be thinking: “I’m not afraid. I’m just mad.” But if you really stop and think about it, fear is usually at the root of what keeps people from moving out of their polarized positions—fear of losing face, fear of losing self, fear of beng used, fear of getting hurt, etc.

 

    • Learn to accept your differences and not be threatened by them. A good deal of your conflicts may arise because of how you view your differences. Conflicts rooted in personality and life experiences are not likely to go away anytime soon. It is best to learn to accept each other and focus on positives and strengths than to be pre-occupied over annoying habits or dissimilar interests.

 

    • Make requests instead of demands. Requests are respectful and open the floor for discussion. Demands will usually just intensify a power struggle.

 

  • Begin to recognize the vicious cycle that you both co-create and take ownership of your part in that cycle. Change the cycle by interrupting it, that is, by not giving your usual response, or by stepping back and doingsomething different. Often this is the very opposite of what you feel like doing in the moment.

Contents of this article go to  Dr. Nathan Cobb of Communication and Conflict Resolution.

 

Speak Your Mind

*

 

The CLR Counseling Group

2102 Cahaba Rd Suite E
Mountain Brook, AL 35223

chesieroberts@gmail.com
205-835-7173

Send Us a Message

By submitting this form via this web portal, you acknowledge and accept the risks of communicating your health information via this unencrypted email and electronic messaging and wish to continue despite those risks. By clicking "Yes, I want to submit this form" you agree to hold Brighter Vision harmless for unauthorized use, disclosure, or access of your protected health information sent via this electronic means.